Post Reply 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Votes - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Friendly Craft Reviews!
2018-06-16, 08:49 AM
Post: #21
RE: Friendly Craft Reviews!
(2018-06-14 08:24 AM)Xalinsky Wrote:  This craft was built for fighting against WF and LH even TG. I like small craft circling around enemy but build small make them really fragile. So I need a tank to take all damage.

And this craft just built for this theme. With 2~3 layer shield at front, a lot smoke, decent HA, warp drive. But only 2 rapid fire advance cannon and no Repair bot.

Aquarius (Xalinsky)

- Warping thrustercraft.
- APS Spammer. Must resist urge to be sarcastic...

- Scylla (BorderWise): Loss
- Retaliator (White Flayers, Expert): Loss
- Teravolt (Lightning Hoods, Expert): Win
- Juggernaut (Twin Guard, Expert): Win
- Judgement (White Flayers, Godly): Win

- Striking paint job.
- VERY fast-firing x2 20mm frag APS. Absolute murder against lightly-armoured or small craft.
- Dodges reasonably well thanks to warp drive.
- Well armoured - lots of Heavy Armour.
- Lots of overlapping shields - resistant to APS, particularly kinetics and frag.

- Warps too often and not far enough to make movement unpredictable. Occasionally warps INTO incoming projectiles.
- Warps just far enough to move out of its own smoke coverage, giving an opening for lasers.
- Frag APS only weapon, with limited arc of fire: ineffective against submarines, superfast craft and good shield layering.
- Steering can get compromised/confused, making it fly at the target backwards.
- No missile defense, so: vulnerable to missiles.
- Relies a lot on Heavy Armour for defense, so is vulnerable to EMP.

- Slower warp time but bigger warp distance.
- Bigger guns, bigger shells - 200-400mm belt-fed HE/Flak might work, or the super-meta HESH/Disruptor combo.
- At least one repair bot.
- Laser absorbing shields (in addition to or replacing smoke).
- Missile defense - IR/radar decoys and CIWS reccomended. Could do combined anti-missile CIWS/Main guns, since the intent is to be a tanky craft.

Good distraction, but could be better. Needs more all-round defensiveness, bigger guns and bigger jumps.

CRAMS, LAMS, CIWS, APS, and other acronyms.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
2018-06-16, 11:35 AM (This post was last modified: 2018-06-16 11:37 AM by Xalinsky.)
Post: #22
RE: Friendly Craft Reviews!
(2018-06-16 08:49 AM)BorderWise Wrote:  - Laser absorbing shields (in addition to or replacing smoke).
- Missile defense - IR/radar decoys and CIWS reccomended. Could do combined anti-missile CIWS/Main guns, since the intent is to be a tanky craft.

Those are really help. Thank you. Big Grin

I may replace all smoke and add more engine and laser absorb shield. then, add LAMS at back-side.

Thanks for review again. Smile
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
2018-06-16, 06:32 PM
Post: #23
RE: Friendly Craft Reviews!
Hercules class land cruiser.

[Image: 3358BE5A866F0B4074F7F20E6A1D24942B7F0F4F]

Attached File(s)
.blueprint  Hercules.blueprint (Size: 669.6 KB / Downloads: 4)

[Image: JRbbeB2m.png][Image: kT4DxcMm.png]
All hail the Queen!
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
2018-06-16, 08:53 PM
Post: #24
RE: Friendly Craft Reviews!
Those legs look a bit close together to be safe from enemy fire...

(2017-04-20 06:54 PM)Hikari Wrote:  I made something that has an impact of a type 1a supernova. The projectile already breaks laws of physics by going way past the speed of light.

2000mm HE Dakka Enthusiast
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
2018-06-17, 02:40 AM
Post: #25
RE: Friendly Craft Reviews!
(2018-06-14 11:42 AM)Void-Person Wrote:  Although i got myself on the list barely, it would still be nice to get faster feedback on this:
Also i shaved the barrels down to 4m because they were shooting eachother and i wanted to have a larger firing angle because naval AI is trash.

[edit] will also be looking forward to checking out others' craft, the ones already here look pretty awesome!

Seawitch Sailship (Void Person)

- Broadsiding sailship, Onyx Watch style.
- Material cost of 222,202
- Green!

- Iron Scylla (BorderWise): Loss
- Iron Cordon (Onyx Watch, Godly): Draw - Stalemate with Iron Cordon's remaining turret unable to get through the LAMS, Seawitch's ammo compartments destroyed and unable to fight back.
- Huskarl (Onyx Watch, Godly): Win
- Trondheim (Steel Striders, Expert): Win
- Titan (Twin Guard, Godly): Loss

- Awesome-looking skulls on the masts. Very aesthetically pleasing overall.
- LOTS of guns, 80+ in total. HESH broadsiders, Disruptor deck guns and AA flak gun. One hell of a broadside volley.
- Very space-efficent APS tetris for broadside guns.
- Ejectors to prevent entire thing blowing up if one gun gets destroyed.
- Torpedoes hidden in the stern.
- PIDs for stability.
- Good butterfly-style shielding.
- Strong LAMS.

- The usual age-of-sail problems: brittle, volatile and when facing a single target half the firepower is pointed in the wrong direction.
- Restrictive broadside settings - has a problem with craft fast enough to stay over 900m away, and exposes its stern when retreating at less than 350m distance.
- Unshielded deck - vulnerable to plunging fire.
- Sides are poorly armoured - once shields are down, hull gets shredded.
- Shaky movement that doesn't help evasiveness.
- Ammo well defended, but when it goes up it REALLY goes up.
- No smoke - gets wrecked by lasers.

- Longer broadside distance, if only to ensure the shields are facing the target.
- Naval yaw PID to smooth out turning (Settings: 0.001, Infinite, 0).
- Speed boost with extra props or dediblades to ensure it closes as fast as possible.
- Could splurge on a repair bot or two, since she's largely made of wood and stone.
- More widely spaced ammo compartments.
- Laser warners + smoke.

A fun craft that unfortunately suffers from many of the same drawbacks as Onyx Watch sailships. Watching it fight a Huskarl was sci-fi-18th-century-style epic. Big Grin
Shall I take this craft off the subscriber review list, seeing as you have feedback now?

CRAMS, LAMS, CIWS, APS, and other acronyms.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
2018-06-17, 02:14 PM
Post: #26
RE: Friendly Craft Reviews!
(2018-06-17 02:40 AM)BorderWise Wrote:  Seawitch Sailship (Void Person)

This feedback has been very helpful! Although I won't edit a design I've called finished, the flaws pointed out here are going to come in handy for new designs. And since I already got the feedback i was looking for, you can take the design off the review list, it seems there are already a few lightyears of content to get through before it. Thanks!
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
2018-06-17, 08:21 PM
Post: #27
RE: Friendly Craft Reviews!
Righty, so of all the crafts that I have, the one which I've worked on the least is a battleship called the Bayonet. I haven't got extensive testing and trials thoroughly through and would like the opinion of other, higher end shipwrights to perfect the design. Keep in mind that I plan to eventually get work done on a Custom Campaign by the name of Uuter, and all the recurring weaknesses found in my craft are faction-lore justified. Not a lot of cheese on this one (even though I'm french) and I found it to be pretty good at what it does, but it's not efficient and I know for a fact that it's not defensive enough. But go ahead and make a judgement of your own, BorderWise or any other honourable shipwright.

.blueprint  Bayonet.blueprint (Size: 445.91 KB / Downloads: 1)

Error 404: pic not found

There are two rules of thumb in this world:
- These warheads are great! Explosive are my favourite! Nothing beats an explosive warhead.
- If explosives aren't enough, spam more explosive. At some point they will break open.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
2018-06-18, 05:20 AM
Post: #28
RE: Friendly Craft Reviews!
(2018-06-15 06:59 AM)oventoaster955 Wrote:  My latest ship, a cruiser, was recently posted, but hasn't got much recognition.

It was originally designed to fight most WF designs reliably, but it has far surpassed my expectations; it can potentially 0-death a Moray.

Nova (oventoaster955)

- Meta minigun-toting battleship/battlecruiser.
- Material cost of 239,754.
- APS spammer and subobject shield user... naughty!

- Iron Scylla (BorderWise): Loss
- Retaliator (White Flayers, Expert): Draw. Nova immobilized, Retaliator rudders blown off and sailed out of weapon range of both craft.
- Judgement (White Flayers, Godly): Loss
- Eyrie (Onyx Watch, Expert): Win
- Iron Wolf (Gray Talons, Expert): Win
- Excalibur (Steel Striders, Expert): Win, but it took 20+ minutes.

- Good-looking ship - sweet turret caps, beautifully trippy tracer rounds.
- x4 150mm flak/disruptor/HE/frag miniguns - decent all-rounder guns.
- Tracers allow for decent accuracy.
- Mini cruise missiles + torpedoes.
- LOTS of shields mounted on internal 2-axis turrets to always face a target.
- Shields well covered by surge protectors.
- Solid LAMS
- Lots of ammo in secure Heavy Armour compartments.
- Good spaced hull armour.

- Vulnerable once ammo magazines for the belt-feeders runs dry - lengthy reloading time.
- Shells are too small (particularly flak and HE) to do heavy damage required of a main weapon, particularly against well armoured and strongly shielded targets.
- Composite+EMP is not an effective combination - does nothing to shields, ineffective against armour.
- Frag shells set to a 1 degree frag angle do very little damage per fragment.
- Shells are somewhat slow - less effective against erratic/fast targets.
- Missiles could be optimized better, e.g fins on the back for reduced drag.
- Shields mounted on turrets cease to provide adequate detection once detection systems are disabled.
- Shields clipping through the hull can catch pen-depth projectiles and frag and potentially make incoming damage worse.
- Relies heavily on shields and has no repair capability - vulnerable to disruptor shells.
- Gaps are still left in shields, allowing plunging shots and fragmentation through.
- Turrets lack internal armour right under the deck- vulnerable to explosion clipping and HEAT/HESH.
- Very narrow turret necks - turret cap at risk of being cut off.
- Turret mounts, steam engine, AI and batteries right at bottom of hull when bottom hull armour is very thin - vulnerable to torpedoes and submarine weapons.
- Eats materials in combat due to big hungry steam engine.
- LAMS wastes power shooting at distant projectiles.
- Lacks passive sonar, so LAMS can't deal with torpedoes. Combined with above-mentioned thin bottom hull = major weakness to torpedoes.
- 360 cameras block each other - wasted processing power.
- Detection equipment exposed and not EMP-proofed - vulnerable to getting blinded, especially by time-fused shells and EMP missiles.
- Standard detection settings - fooled by aim-point spoofing.

- Regular fixed shields to alleviate cheesiness and add reliability.
- Armour the inside of the turrets.
- Slightler larger gauge (200-300mm) and switch to regular autoloaders for slower but more sustained rate of fire.
- Switch ammo to combination of Disruptor-EMP/Frag/HESH to counter shields and armour in equal measure. Frag angle should be at least 30 degrees for optimal damage and AP value.
- Matter of opinion, but slightly more transparent shields might look better and improve performance.
- Could use a repair bot or two.
- Tighter range on the LAMS.
- Heavy armour/layered metal underneath turret mountings.
- Dedicated missile/sonar decoys.
- Set aim-point to random block targeting and/or faster target block switching.

A solid airship killer, but uses shield exploits and needs a fair bit of optimization.
Epic duel against the Retaliator. Managed to put an Eyrie into the water, which I have literally never seen before. o_O
If you don't say 'Taste the rainbow, motherf****r' at least once when seeing this craft in action I am going to be disappointed.

CRAMS, LAMS, CIWS, APS, and other acronyms.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
2018-06-18, 06:09 AM
Post: #29
RE: Friendly Craft Reviews!
(2018-06-18 05:20 AM)BorderWise Wrote:  Nova (oventoaster955)

Thank you for reviewing my cruiser. The ship was primarily designed for Regular difficulty enemies, but I am proud to see that it can take down OW and SS crafts decently well too.

The shields were just me being frustrated with shield placement, then realizing I could just get the ship to aim the shields for me. It made a massive difference in the survivability of my smaller ships, so I started implementing them fleet-wide.

The goal of the Nova was to settle fights against aerial and surface builds in less than a minute. Seeing that some ships took 20 minutes to take down is a failure in my eyes.

As for the ammo, the belts were optimised for both variance and projectile speed; different speeds tended to mess up targeting.

Overall, your review was fair. I can definitely add a passive sonar suite and underbelly armor to the Nova, though the novelty of rapid-fire cannons is wearing off on me, and I might switch to more traditional armament (Most of my fleet is almost exclusively 8m×500mm HESH or 2000mm CRAMs).
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
2018-06-21, 02:34 AM
Post: #30
RE: Friendly Craft Reviews!
This is the semi-realistic cruiser I made for Cruiser Clash 2. I've improved upon it since the tournament ended and now I think it strikes a decent balance between looks and performance. I've refrained from using spinblocks and pistons for anything other than visuals. I'd like to see what I could improve upon performance wise whilst maintaining the current aesthetics.

Length: 145m
Width: 21m
Height: 43m
Blocks : 9019
Volume: 20332.77
Price: 148961 materials

[Image: BvwjPNm.jpg]

Attached File(s)
.blueprint  Carbunup-Class Cruiser.blueprint (Size: 525.02 KB / Downloads: 5)
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 

Forum Jump:

User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)