Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Votes - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
V2.01 [Dev Test]
2017-08-17, 06:20 PM
Post: #71
RE: V2.01 [Dev Test]
(2017-08-17 05:44 PM)benzo711 Wrote:  
(2017-08-17 04:09 PM)Richard Dastardly Wrote:  Except, y'know, people who can't because ... they're at work, or they don't have time to track moving chat conversations and want condensed thoughtful info they can read at leisure, or a myriad of other reasons.

OR. OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR. They were banned.

Why exactly you was banned for ?
Just curious.

Ur mum is a nice lady.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
2017-08-17, 06:50 PM
Post: #72
RE: V2.01 [Dev Test]
People dont usually get banned for light reasons (Usually they just get a slap on the wrist) he must have done something major

[Image: vP4vDHc.png]

Check out my Zrytix, Land RTS
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
2017-08-17, 07:06 PM
Post: #73
RE: V2.01 [Dev Test]
(2017-08-17 06:20 PM)Klayn_Rogue Wrote:  
(2017-08-17 05:44 PM)benzo711 Wrote:  
(2017-08-17 04:09 PM)Richard Dastardly Wrote:  Except, y'know, people who can't because ... they're at work, or they don't have time to track moving chat conversations and want condensed thoughtful info they can read at leisure, or a myriad of other reasons.

OR. OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR. They were banned.

Why exactly you was banned for ?
Just curious.

Forgot that even "anything goes" in the off-topic, you have to not spam, and I was typing random letters.

(Funny thing is, Spookywaggon/Lyon King was unbanned, even though he was spamming as well Dodgy )

"That shouldn't have worked, but it did"-JSE

My last name is Proctor
The Proctor is a ship in the game
Yay. I am happy.

Blueprint thread: http://www.fromthedepthsgame.com/forum/s...?tid=28006

Themes: http://www.fromthedepthsgame.com/forum/s...?tid=28174
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
2017-08-17, 08:13 PM
Post: #74
RE: V2.01 [Dev Test]
(2017-08-17 07:06 PM)benzo711 Wrote:  
(2017-08-17 06:20 PM)Klayn_Rogue Wrote:  
(2017-08-17 05:44 PM)benzo711 Wrote:  
(2017-08-17 04:09 PM)Richard Dastardly Wrote:  Except, y'know, people who can't because ... they're at work, or they don't have time to track moving chat conversations and want condensed thoughtful info they can read at leisure, or a myriad of other reasons.

OR. OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR. They were banned.

Why exactly you was banned for ?
Just curious.

Forgot that even "anything goes" in the off-topic, you have to not spam, and I was typing random letters.

(Funny thing is, Spookywaggon/Lyon King was unbanned, even though he was spamming as well Dodgy )

If that is true then it is a weird reason to ban someone.

Ur mum is a nice lady.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
2017-08-18, 10:43 PM
Post: #75
RE: V2.01 [Dev Test]
(2017-08-14 02:24 AM)T3hJimmer Wrote:  
(2017-08-13 08:57 PM)Kiriko Wrote:  On the APS muzzle flash, if the black ink-smoke went away, the length of the flash was cut to about 1/2 or 1/3, and possibly the effect had either reduced contrast or some transparency... it could look better.

upvote!

I'd recommend to try to model the APS flashes/smoke after latest upcoming revamp in WOWS as highlighted in this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33lfC3wBnR0

these are still quite large, but much shorter and in no way intrusive and obstructive.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Yesterday, 01:41 AM
Post: #76
RE: V2.01 [Dev Test]
(2017-08-17 08:13 PM)Klayn_Rogue Wrote:  If that is true then it is a weird reason to ban someone.

Not really. If you're doing something that serves no other purpose than making the chat more difficult for others to use, and generally annoying everyone else.. I don't think that's such a strange reason.

Beyond that I'm not going to speculate on it without having actually been there to see what was going on.

Workshop: Voidware, INARI and more.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Yesterday, 03:08 AM (This post was last modified: Yesterday 05:53 AM by Kiriko.)
Post: #77
RE: V2.01 [Dev Test]
(2017-08-18 10:43 PM)harnas1977 Wrote:  
(2017-08-14 02:24 AM)T3hJimmer Wrote:  
(2017-08-13 08:57 PM)Kiriko Wrote:  On the APS muzzle flash, if the black ink-smoke went away, the length of the flash was cut to about 1/2 or 1/3, and possibly the effect had either reduced contrast or some transparency... it could look better.

upvote!

I'd recommend to try to model the APS flashes/smoke after latest upcoming revamp in WOWS as highlighted in this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33lfC3wBnR0

these are still quite large, but much shorter and in no way intrusive and obstructive.

Compared to size of ship, the muzzle flashes look smaller, and those ships aren't firing 499mm cannons at 300rpm in 10 second bursts. Not saying it's bad idea as such - they look good - just I think the flashes and smoke in that video would become kind of intrusive too if you spammed it several times per second, in long bursts.

It's why I think reducing the flash effect based on reload time might help - if you have a 500mm that fires like a gatling, then giving it visual effect that's more appropriate for gatling could work.

-- edit --
..ah, if by 'shorter' you meant shorter in size and not in duration... then yes, in that sense I think it's going towards right direction.

Workshop: Voidware, INARI and more.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)